Theme: Density, migration, and innovation.
Subject Article: "San Francisco City-Makers Say the Tech Sector Is No Good at Urbanism."
Other Links: 1. "The Geography of Anti-Gentrification: Google Buses and the World Trade Center."
2. "What Tech Hasn’t Learned From Urban Planning."
3. "Expensive cities are killing creativity: New York City, a traditional incubator for artists, has now become a 'gated citadel' for creativity."
4. "Loudoun County population is the fastest-growing in fast-growing Northern Virginia."
Postscript: I published the blog post at Pacific Standard yesterday. I read the following this morning:
This group of people, the tech workers who came here strictly to follow money, is a serious point of tension among San Franciscans. Pat T describes, “Now that they’re here they have all these complaints about it…Twitter just happens to be here. That’s a point of contention for a lot of people in the city because a lot of people want SF to be their idea of SF. They have this idea of San Francisco, and these new transplants aren’t coming for that same city.”
The artists are indigenous, the real San Francisco. The techies are newcomers, who don't understand the city's soul. The gentrification battle is about control of urban space, not displacement.
1 comment:
I've never understood why people have had a hard time believing that an important part of the creative class - probably the single most important part - that is known for embracing pocket protectors would prefer suburban life over urban life.
Post a Comment